Your Opinion

Home Letters To The Editor Mike Barrett engaging in Jim Spore's "Smoke 'n Mirrors" accounting to justify taxpayer ripoff!
Editor:

Contrary to Mikes Barrett's relentless and inaccurate assertion, (in a letter to another organization) the debt service on the Town Center TIF is NOT being paid off by the new taxes of the project. Not by a long shot!

The TIF has siphoned off the tax revenue from 560+ self sufficient properties from the General Fund. These properties are located in the "non-core" boundary within 317 acres of the so called TIF.  

The real estate revenues generated from the 317 acres help subsidize the 33 acre Town Center TIF.

These major tax dollars represent about half of the revenues required to pay down on the TIF debt service or other related Town Center costs.   

Furthermore, much of the TIF tax dollars received from "non-core" & "core" real estate does not all go directly to the General Fund.  Much of it is actually diverted to the resort area.  

Included in that massive subsidy is a whopping 75% of all citywide hotel room tax, 36.4% of all citywide food tax, and 100% of all citywide amusement tax .

A monumental $42 million was hijacked off these specific tax rolls last year alone! The new TIF's real estate tax will not go into the General Fund for 20+ years and that may be extended by another 5 to 10 years similar to the practice recently enacted by several states.

The City's tax base is 85% residential vs 15% commercial and that simply means that residents carry most of the tax burden and are responsible for most of the tax revenue.

Residents also support 85% of the debt ceiling based on the residential assets of there assessments which approximates $47 billion in FY 2010.

The City borrowed about $3 billion and paid back $1.6 billion since 2000 with the remainder treated as long term debt.

In 2009, the long term debt service approximated $1.7 billion and that sizable debt included some $470+ million in interest charges!  

Despite the fact that residents serve as the primary economic benefactor in VB and account for 85% of debt service payments, very little of either the tax revenue or bond revenue are returned to revitalize the 987 aging neighborhoods.


Al Saferstein - Virginia Beach Citizen
Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments
Add New
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Mike Barrett  - Response to the Whopper |216.54.27.206 |04-08-2010 15:59:03
So you set up a straw man, and then knock it down. Shame on you Al.

The size of the TIF district has been well known for years. This is not news, nor is it a revelation. It continues to amaze me that the positive financial performance of this and other TIFs and PPVs is condemned by the old men of the VBTA.

It is as if you want these projects to fail so you can pay more real estate taxes. It is so bizarre it is almost not believable.

Taxpayer associations usually work for lower real estate taxes, except in Virginia Beach, where they are working to oppose projects that actually reduce the real estate taxes paid by homeowners.

My advice to readers is get the latest report and read it for yourself. If you allow the VBTA officers to interpret for you, all you get is their misguided and absurd attempts to make water out of wine.

Who wants that?
Wally Erb  - Please explain |72.254.186.165 |04-08-2010 21:18:43
Virginia has to pass legislation designed to curb the abuse of TIFs. The town center is atypical of the misapplication for which TIFs were intended to accomplish. Valid productive concerns, such as Best Buy, were included where no blight or development is required.

The process led to favoritism for politically connected developers, lawyers, and economic development directors.
Mike Barrett  - What a crock! |216.54.27.206 |04-09-2010 16:09:06
Wally, the TIFs work so well the City gets an annual return on their investment, and when the public improvements are paid off, all the new real estate tax revenue will go into the general fund.

Further, the Virginia Statute is recognized as one of the best in the nation, replicated by many other states. So you saying it needs to be revised is simply ridiculous.

How can you and VBTA keep working against the interests of the very tax payers you claim to represent?
alsaf |24.253.145.243 |04-11-2010 12:21:26
Mike, See what happens when you use your own facts. if the Virginia Statute is recognized as one of the best in the world why did the City siphon off 317 acres within a boundary of 560+ established properties that has ZERO to do with the 33 acre TIF site at Town Center. Since when do you use major established real estates to subsidize a TIF and remove the taxable revenue away from the General Fund, schools, and essential services?
Mike Barrett  - Old Men |67.62.94.176 |04-12-2010 04:46:41
Al, please, your efforts to derail a process that has led to quality redevelopment of sites within the TIF is almost laughable given the so called mission of the VBTA.

In the old days, at least your group seemed sincere in opposing policies that increased the real estate tax rate. Now, those same tired old men rejected by the electorate over and over again, seem fixated on killing the very policies that have produced increases in the commercial real estate tax base that reduce the taxes homeowners have to pay.

Please, keep up your fine work, because next time, instead of less than 16% of the vote, I suspect you will earn less than 10%. You deserve it. MJB sends!
Robert Clayman  - Stop Belly-aching, Mike |67.62.94.176 |04-12-2010 11:43:38
Stop Belly-aching and whining, Mikey. You're out-classed because you can't produce facts to support your arguments.

Admit it, you are Spore's biggest suck up!
Mike Barrett |216.54.27.206 |04-12-2010 12:38:09
Facts? You actually think the VBTA is impressed with facts? How naive. They have read the proof of the value of PPVs and they simply dismiss the facts because the facts don't jive with their pre-conceived ideological rants.

So they ignore the facts and just keep spouting off with the same baloney they have used for the last decade, during which time their credibility and their electoral record has diminished each year.

So if they keep the same stuff up, is it actually possible to poll a negative number? We will soon find out. MJB sends!